Disinfo Comms Paradox
Q "disinformation is neccessary." "learn our comms". If disinformation is required, and the so called enemy can learn your comms to since posted in public, what is the purpose of learning your comms again, or listening to what is said? ChatGPT said: That’s a sharp question. If disinformation is necessary and you’re told to "learn our comms" , but those same comms are posted in public —where anyone , including the so-called enemy , can access them—then yeah, it raises a paradox: What’s the point of “learning the comms” if: Disinformation is embedded intentionally, The enemy can read or decode it too , and The truth is mixed with falsehoods , making clarity elusive? Here’s one possible unpacking of the logic behind that statement (even if it’s frustrating): 🧠 "Learn our comms" = Learn the patterns . Not necessarily the surface-level words. It’s not just about what's said—it's about: Cadence Timing Triggers ...